1.
Hogg, M.A., Vaughan, G.M.: Social psychology. Prentice Hall, Harlow (2011).
2.
Hogg, M.A., Vaughan, G.M.: Social psychology. Pearson, Harlow, England (2014).
3.
Hogg and Vaughan (2018): Social psychology (ebook). Pearson, New York.
4.
Aronson, Elliot, Wilson, Timothy D., Akert, Robin M.: Social psychology. Prentice Hall, London (2010).
5.
Aronson et al (2017): Social psychology (ebook). Pearson, Columbus.
6.
Augoustinos, Martha, Walker, Iain, Donaghue, Ngaire: Social cognition: an integrated introduction. SAGE, London (2014).
7.
Baron, Robert A., Byrne, Donn Erwin, Branscombe, Nyla R.: Social psychology. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, Boston (2009).
8.
Crisp, Richard J., Turner, Rhiannon N.: Essential social psychology. SAGE, London (2010).
9.
Stroebe, W., Jonas, K., Hewstone, M. eds: An introduction to social psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ (2015).
10.
Fiske, Susan T., Taylor, Shelley E.: Social cognition. McGraw Hill (1991).
11.
Forsyth, D.R.: Group dynamics. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Belmont, Calif (2013).
12.
Langdridge, Darren, Taylor, Stephanie: Critical readings in social psychology. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2006).
13.
Wetherell, Margaret, Open University: Identities, groups and social issues. SAGE, London (1996).
14.
Moscovici (1984: reprinted in 2000): The phenomenon of social representations. In: Social Representations. Polity Press.
15.
Gawronski (2012): Back to the Future of Dissonance Theory: Cognitive Consistency as a Core Motive. Social Cognition. 30, 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.652.
16.
Fesinger and Carlsmith (1959): Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 58, 203–210.
17.
Cooper, J.F.: A new look at dissonance theory.
18.
Egan et al (2007): The Origins of Cognitive Dissonance: Evidence From Children and Monkeys. Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell). 18, 978–983.
19.
Elliot, Andrew J.1Devine, Patricia G.2: On the Motivational Nature of Cognitive Dissonance: Dissonance as Psychological Discomfort. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 67, 382–394.
20.
Aronson (1992): The Return of the Repressed: Dissonance Theory Makes a Comeback. Psychological Inquiry. 3,.
21.
Girandola, Fabien1: Double Forced Compliance and Cognitive Dissonance Theory. Journal of Social Psychology. 137, 594–605.
22.
Aaker and Maheswaran (1997): The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research. 24, 315–328.
23.
Aaker, Jennifer L.1: Accessibility or Diagnosticity? Disentangling the Influence of Culture on Persuasion Processes and Attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research. 26, 340–357.
24.
Cacioppo and Petty (1984): The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research. 11, 673–675.
25.
Chen and Lee (2008): The role of personality traits and perceived values in persuasion: an elaboration likelihood model perspective on online shopping. Social Behavior & Personality: an international journal. 36,.
26.
Cialdini, Robert B.1: Harnessing the science of persuasion. ASCA Newsletter. 2014,.
27.
Meungguk Park1parkm@siu.eduTurner, Brian A.2Pastore, Donna L.2: Effective Public Service Advertisements to Attract Volunteers for the Special Olympics: An Elaboration Likelihood Perspective. Sport Management Review (Sport Management Association of  Australia & New Zealand). 11,.
28.
Beaman, A., Cole, C., Preston, M., Klentz, B.: Fifteen years of foot-in-the-door research: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 9, 181–196 (1983).
29.
Chaiken, S., Baldwin, M.W.: Affective-cognitive consistency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-perception of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 41, 1–12 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.1.
30.
Valins, S.: Emotionality and information concerning internal reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 6, 458–463 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024842.
31.
Seligman, C., Bush, M., Kirsch, K.: Relationship between compliance in the foot-in-the-door paradigm and size of first request. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 33, 517–520 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.33.5.517.
32.
Fiske, S.T.: Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In: The handbook of social psychology. pp. 357–411. McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass (1998).
33.
Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., Schwartz, J.L.K.: Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74, 1464–1480 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
34.
Manning (2009): The effects of subjective norms on behaviour in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology. 48, 649–705. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X393136.
35.
Leary, M.R., Tambor, E.S., Terdal, S.K., Downs, D.L.: Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 68, 518–530 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518.
36.
Forsyth, D.R.: Group dynamics. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Belmont, Calif (2013).
37.
Pyszczynski, Tom, Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, US, tpyszczy@uccs.edu Greenberg, Jeff, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USSolomon, Sheldon, Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, USArndt, Jamie, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri--Columbia, Columbia, MO, USSchimel, Jeff, Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada: Why Do People Need Self-Esteem? A Theoretical and Empirical Review. Psychological Bulletin.
38.
Harmon-Jones, E., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., McGregor, H.: Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduced mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 72, 24–36 (1997).
39.
Burke, B.L., Martens, A., Faucher, E.H.: Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 14, 155–195 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352321.
40.
Lickel, Brian, U California, Dept of Psychology, Santa Barbara, CA, USHamilton, David L.Wieczorkowska, GrazynaLewis, AmySherman, Steven J.Uhles, A. Neville: Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
41.
Ecology and Society: The People Paradox: Self-Esteem Striving, Immortality Ideologies, and Human Response to Climate Change, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art34/.
42.
Hogg, M.A., Hohman, Z.P., Rivera, J.E.: Why Do People Join Groups? Three Motivational Accounts from Social Psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2, 1269–1280 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00099.x.
43.
Adorno, T.W., Aron, B., Levinson, M.H., Morrow, W.: The authoritarian personality. W. W. Norton, New York (1993).
44.
Brown, R., Brown, R.: Prejudice: It’s social psychology. Blackwell, Oxford (1995).
45.
Devine, P.G.: Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 56, 5–18 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5.
46.
Kinder, D.R., Sears, D.O.: Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 40, 414–431 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.414.
47.
Durrheim, K., Dixon, J.: Attitudes in the Fiber of Everyday Life: The Discourse of Racial Evaluation and the Lived Experience of Desegregation. American Psychologist. 59, 626–636 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.626.
48.
Duckitt, J.H.: Psychology and prejudice: A historical analysis and integrative framework. American Psychologist. 47, 1182–1193 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.10.1182.
49.
Glick, P., Fiske, S.T.: An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist. 56, 109–118 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109.
50.
Sears, D.O., Henry, P.J.: The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 85, 259–275 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.259.
51.
Louw-Potgieter, J.: The Authoritarian Personality: An Inadequate Explanation for Intergroup Conflict in South Africa. Journal of Social Psychology. 128, (1988).
52.
Pettigrew, T.F., Meertens, R.W.: Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology. 25, 57–75 (1995).
53.
Hodson, G., Hooper, H., Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L.: Aversive racism in Britain: the use of inadmissible evidence in legal decisions. European Journal of Social Psychology. 35, 437–448 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.261.
54.
Sassenberg, K., Moskowitz, G.B.: Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 41, 506–514 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.10.002.
55.
Jackson, J.W.: Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. Psychological Record. 43, 395–404 (1993).
56.
Bobo, L.: Whites’ opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or realistic group conflict? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45, 1196–1210 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1196.
57.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M.G., Bundy, R.P., Flament, C.: Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1, 149–178 (1971).
58.
Crisp, R.J., Turner, R.N.: Essential social psychology. SAGE, London (2010).
59.
Swim, J.K., Aikin, K.J., Hall, W.S., Hunter, B.A.: Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 68, 199–214 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199.
60.
Reicher, S.D., Haslam, S.A., Rath, R.: Making a virtue of evil: A five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2, 1313–1344 (2008).
61.
Hornsey, Matthew J.. University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia, m.hornsey@uq.edu.au: Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,. 2, 204–222 (2008).
62.
Postmes, T., Spears, R.: Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 123, 238–259 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.3.238.
63.
Cronin, P., Reicher, S.: Accountability processes and group dynamics: a SIDE perspective on the policing of an anti-capitalist riot. European Journal of Social Psychology. 39, 237–254 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.544.
64.
Reicher, S. D.: The St. Pauls’ riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol 14(1), Jan-Mar, 1984. (1984). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/10.1002/ejsp.2420140102.
65.
Potter, J., Reicher, S.: Discourses of community and conflict: The organization of social categories in accounts of a ‘riot.’ British Journal of Social Psychology. 26, 25–40 (1987).
66.
Aiello, G.: Citizen, interrupted: The 2011 English riots from a psychosocial perspective. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, Vol 22(1), Mar, 2013. (2013).
67.
Drury, J., Reicher, S.: Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology. 39, 579–604 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164642.
68.
Festinger, L.: Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol 47(2, Suppl), Apr, 1952. (1952). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/10.1037/h0057906.
69.
Reicher, S.D.: ‘The Battle of Westminster’: Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology. 26, 115–134 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199601)26:1<115::AID-EJSP740>3.0.CO;2-Z.
70.
Reicher, S.: Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol 33(2), Jun, 1994. (1994). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01015.x.
71.
Stott, Clifford: Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the ‘poll tax riot.’ Human Relations, Vol 53(2), Feb, 2000. (2000).
72.
Stott, Clifford: Crowd action as intergroup process: Introducing the police perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol 28(4), Jul-Aug, 1998. (1998). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<509::AID-EJSP877>3.0.CO;2-C.
73.
Waddington, D., King, M.: The Disorderly Crowd: From Classical Psychological Reductionism to Socio-Contextual Theory--The Impact on Public Order Policing Strategies. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 44, 490–503 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2005.00393.x.
74.
Prentice-Dunn, S., Rogers, R.W.: Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 43, 503–513 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.503.
75.
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., Spears, R.: Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin. 134, 504–535 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504.
76.
Gergen, K.J.: The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist. 40, 266–275 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.3.266.
77.
Kessen, W.: The American child and other cultural inventions. American Psychologist. 34, 815–820 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.815.
78.
Gergen, K.J.: Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 26, 309–320 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034436.
79.
Shotter (1997): The social construction of our ‘inner lives’, http://www.massey.ac.nz/~alock/virtual/inner.htm.
80.
Burr (1995), Myilibrary: An introduction to social constructionism. Routledge, London.
81.
Slife, B.D.: The Special Issue on Ken Gergen’s Book. Journal of Constructivist Psychology. 24, 277–279 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2011.593448.