1
Hogg MA, Vaughan GM. Social psychology. 6th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall 2011.
2
Hogg MA, Vaughan GM. Social psychology. 7th edition. Harlow, England: Pearson 2014.
3
Hogg and Vaughan (2018). Social psychology (ebook). Eighth edition. New York: Pearson .
4
Aronson, Elliot, Wilson, Timothy D., Akert, Robin M. Social psychology. 7th ed. London: Prentice Hall 2010.
5
Aronson et al (2017). Social psychology (ebook). Ninth edition, Global edition. Columbus: Pearson .
6
Augoustinos, Martha, Walker, Iain, Donaghue, Ngaire. Social cognition: an integrated introduction. 3rd ed. London: SAGE 2014.
7
Baron, Robert A., Byrne, Donn Erwin, Branscombe, Nyla R. Social psychology. 12th int. ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon 2009.
8
Crisp, Richard J., Turner, Rhiannon N. Essential social psychology. 2nd ed. London: SAGE 2010.
9
Stroebe W, Jonas K, Hewstone M, editors. An introduction to social psychology. Sixth edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons 2015.
10
Fiske, Susan T., Taylor, Shelley E. Social cognition. 2nd ed. McGraw Hill 1991.
11
Forsyth DR. Group dynamics. Sixth international edition (cover). Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Cengage Learning 2013.
12
Langdridge, Darren, Taylor, Stephanie. Critical readings in social psychology. Maidenhead: Open University Press 2006.
13
Wetherell, Margaret, Open University. Identities, groups and social issues. London: SAGE 1996.
14
Moscovici (1984: reprinted in 2000). The phenomenon of social representations. Social Representations. Polity Press .
15
Gawronski (2012). Back to the Future of Dissonance Theory: Cognitive Consistency as a Core Motive. Social Cognition. ;30:652–68. doi: 10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.652
16
Fesinger and Carlsmith (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology. ;58:203–10.
17
Cooper JF. A new look at dissonance theory.
18
Egan et al (2007). The Origins of Cognitive Dissonance: Evidence From Children and Monkeys. Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell). ;18:978–83.
19
Elliot, Andrew J.1Devine, Patricia G.2. On the Motivational Nature of Cognitive Dissonance: Dissonance as Psychological Discomfort. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. ;67:382–94.
20
Aronson (1992). The Return of the Repressed: Dissonance Theory Makes a Comeback. Psychological Inquiry. ;3.
21
Girandola, Fabien1. Double Forced Compliance and Cognitive Dissonance Theory. Journal of Social Psychology. ;137:594–605.
22
Aaker and Maheswaran (1997). The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research. ;24:315–28.
23
Aaker, Jennifer L.1. Accessibility or Diagnosticity? Disentangling the Influence of Culture on Persuasion Processes and Attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research. ;26:340–57.
24
Cacioppo and Petty (1984). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research. ;11:673–5.
25
Chen and Lee (2008). The role of personality traits and perceived values in persuasion: an elaboration likelihood model perspective on online shopping. Social Behavior & Personality: an international journal. ;36.
26
Cialdini, Robert B.1. Harnessing the science of persuasion. ASCA Newsletter. ;2014.
27
Meungguk Park1parkm@siu.eduTurner, Brian A.2Pastore, Donna L.2. Effective Public Service Advertisements to Attract Volunteers for the Special Olympics: An Elaboration Likelihood Perspective. Sport Management Review (Sport Management Association of Australia & New Zealand). ;11.
28
Beaman A, Cole C, Preston M, et al. Fifteen years of foot-in-the-door research: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1983;9:181–96.
29
Chaiken S, Baldwin MW. Affective-cognitive consistency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-perception of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1981;41:1–12. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.1
30
Valins S. Emotionality and information concerning internal reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1967;6:458–63. doi: 10.1037/h0024842
31
Seligman C, Bush M, Kirsch K. Relationship between compliance in the foot-in-the-door paradigm and size of first request. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1976;33:517–20. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.33.5.517
32
Fiske ST. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. The handbook of social psychology. Boston, Mass: McGraw-Hill 1998:357–411.
33
Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;74:1464–80. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
34
Manning (2009). The effects of subjective norms on behaviour in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology. ;48:649–705. doi: 10.1348/014466608X393136
35
Leary MR, Tambor ES, Terdal SK, et al. Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;68:518–30. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518
36
Forsyth DR. Group dynamics. Sixth international edition (cover). Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Cengage Learning 2013.
37
Pyszczynski, Tom, Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, US, tpyszczy@uccs.edu Greenberg, Jeff, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USSolomon, Sheldon, Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, USArndt, Jamie, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri--Columbia, Columbia, MO, USSchimel, Jeff, Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. Why Do People Need Self-Esteem? A Theoretical and Empirical Review. Psychological Bulletin.
38
Harmon-Jones E, Simon L, Greenberg J, et al. Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduced mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;72:24–36.
39
Burke BL, Martens A, Faucher EH. Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2010;14:155–95. doi: 10.1177/1088868309352321
40
Lickel, Brian, U California, Dept of Psychology, Santa Barbara, CA, USHamilton, David L.Wieczorkowska, GrazynaLewis, AmySherman, Steven J.Uhles, A. Neville. Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
41
Ecology and Society: The People Paradox: Self-Esteem Striving, Immortality Ideologies, and Human Response to Climate Change. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art34/
42
Hogg MA, Hohman ZP, Rivera JE. Why Do People Join Groups? Three Motivational Accounts from Social Psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2008;2:1269–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00099.x
43
Adorno TW, Aron B, Levinson MH, et al. The authoritarian personality. Abridged ed. New York: W. W. Norton 1993.
44
Brown R, Brown R. Prejudice: It’s social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell 1995.
45
Devine PG. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;56:5–18. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
46
Kinder DR, Sears DO. Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1981;40:414–31. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.414
47
Durrheim K, Dixon J. Attitudes in the Fiber of Everyday Life: The Discourse of Racial Evaluation and the Lived Experience of Desegregation. American Psychologist. 2004;59:626–36. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.626
48
Duckitt JH. Psychology and prejudice: A historical analysis and integrative framework. American Psychologist. 1992;47:1182–93. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.10.1182
49
Glick P, Fiske ST. An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist. 2001;56:109–18. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
50
Sears DO, Henry PJ. The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;85:259–75. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.259
51
Louw-Potgieter, J. The Authoritarian Personality: An Inadequate Explanation for Intergroup Conflict in South Africa. Journal of Social Psychology. 1988;128.
52
Pettigrew TF, Meertens RW. Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1995;25:57–75.
53
Hodson G, Hooper H, Dovidio JF, et al. Aversive racism in Britain: the use of inadmissible evidence in legal decisions. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2005;35:437–48. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.261
54
Sassenberg K, Moskowitz GB. Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2005;41:506–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.10.002
55
Jackson JW. Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. Psychological Record. 1993;43:395–404.
56
Bobo L. Whites’ opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or realistic group conflict? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983;45:1196–210. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1196
57
Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, et al. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1971;1:149–78.
58
Crisp RJ, Turner RN. Essential social psychology. 2nd ed. London: SAGE 2010.
59
Swim JK, Aikin KJ, Hall WS, et al. Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;68:199–214. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199
60
Reicher SD, Haslam SA, Rath R. Making a virtue of evil: A five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2008;2:1313–44.
61
Hornsey, Matthew J.. University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia, m.hornsey@uq.edu.au. Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,. 2008;2:204–22.
62
Postmes T, Spears R. Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 1998;123:238–59. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.3.238
63
Cronin P, Reicher S. Accountability processes and group dynamics: a SIDE perspective on the policing of an anti-capitalist riot. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2009;39:237–54. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.544
64
Reicher, S. D. The St. Pauls’ riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol 14(1), Jan-Mar, 1984. Published Online First: 1984. doi: http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/10.1002/ejsp.2420140102
65
Potter J, Reicher S. Discourses of community and conflict: The organization of social categories in accounts of a ‘riot.’ British Journal of Social Psychology. 1987;26:25–40.
66
Aiello, G. Citizen, interrupted: The 2011 English riots from a psychosocial perspective. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, Vol 22(1), Mar, 2013. Published Online First: 2013.
67
Drury J, Reicher S. Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2000;39:579–604. doi: 10.1348/014466600164642
68
Festinger, L. Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol 47(2, Suppl), Apr, 1952. Published Online First: 1952. doi: http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/10.1037/h0057906
69
Reicher SD. ‘The Battle of Westminster’: Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1996;26:115–34. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199601)26:1<115::AID-EJSP740>3.0.CO;2-Z
70
Reicher, S. Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol 33(2), Jun, 1994. Published Online First: 1994. doi: http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01015.x
71
Stott, Clifford. Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the ‘poll tax riot.’ Human Relations, Vol 53(2), Feb, 2000. Published Online First: 2000.
72
Stott, Clifford. Crowd action as intergroup process: Introducing the police perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol 28(4), Jul-Aug, 1998. Published Online First: 1998. doi: http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<509::AID-EJSP877>3.0.CO;2-C
73
Waddington D, King M. The Disorderly Crowd: From Classical Psychological Reductionism to Socio-Contextual Theory--The Impact on Public Order Policing Strategies. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 2005;44:490–503. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2005.00393.x
74
Prentice-Dunn S, Rogers RW. Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982;43:503–13. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.503
75
van Zomeren M, Postmes T, Spears R. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin. 2008;134:504–35. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
76
Gergen KJ. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist. 1985;40:266–75. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.40.3.266
77
Kessen W. The American child and other cultural inventions. American Psychologist. 1979;34:815–20. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.815
78
Gergen KJ. Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1973;26:309–20. doi: 10.1037/h0034436
79
Shotter (1997). The social construction of our ‘inner lives’. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~alock/virtual/inner.htm
80
Burr (1995), Myilibrary. An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge .
81
Slife BD. The Special Issue on Ken Gergen’s Book. Journal of Constructivist Psychology. 2011;24:277–9. doi: 10.1080/10720537.2011.593448
