1.
Kaldor M. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Polity Press; 2003. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9780745674490
2.
Edwards M. Civil Society. 2nd ed. Polity; 2009. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9780745675435
3.
Lipschutz RD. Power, Politics and Global Civil Society. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2005;33(3):747-769. doi:10.1177/03058298050330030401
4.
Diani M. The Cement of Civil Society: Studying Networks in Localities. Vol Cambridge studies in contentious politics. Cambridge University Press; 2015. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9781316327500
5.
Keane J. Global Civil Society? Vol Contemporary political theory. Cambridge University Press; 2003.
6.
Kaldor M. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Polity Press; 2003. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9780745674490
7.
Keck, Margaret E., Sikkink, Kathryn. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press; 1998. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/lib/ulinc/detail.action?docID=3138636
8.
Glasius M, Kaldor M, Anheier H, eds. Global Civil Society 2002. Oxford University Press; 2002.
9.
Smith J, Chatfield C, Pagnucco R. Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity beyond the State. Syracuse University Press; 1997.
10.
Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James V., Sikkink, Kathryn. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms. Vol Social movements, protest, and contention. University of Minnesota Press; 2002.
11.
Gaventa, John. Finding the Spaces for Change: A Power Analysis. IDS Bulletin. 2006;37(6):23-33.
12.
Goodwin J, Jasper JM, eds. The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts. Third edition. Wiley Blackwell; 2015. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9781118729960
13.
Della Porta D, Diani M. Social Movements: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Blackwell; 2006. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9781405148214
14.
Hickey S, Mitlin D, Bebbington A. Can NGOs Make a Difference?: The Challenge of Development Alternatives. Zed Books; 2008. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9781848132801
15.
Smith J, Chatfield C, Pagnucco R. Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity beyond the State. Syracuse University Press; 1997.
16.
Bosi L, Giugni M, Uba K, eds. The Consequences of Social Movements. Cambridge University Press; 2016.
17.
Witter R, Marion Suiseeya KR, Gruby RL, et al. Moments of influence in global environmental governance. Environmental Politics. 2015;24(6):894-912. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1060036
18.
Hickey S, Mitlin D, Bebbington A. Can NGOs Make a Difference?: The Challenge of Development Alternatives. Zed Books; 2008. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9781848132801
19.
Choudry AA, Kapoor D. NGOization: Complicity, Contradictions and Prospects. Zed Books; 2013. http://proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781780322599
20.
Bob, Clifford. The Global Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics. Vol Cambridge studies in contentious politics. Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ulinc/detail.action?docID=833375
21.
Bernauer T, Betzold C. Civil Society in Global Environmental Governance. The Journal of Environment & Development. 2012;21(1):62-66. doi:10.1177/1070496511435551
22.
Kaldor M, Moore HL, Selchow S, Murray-Leach T. Global Civil Society 2012: Ten Years of Critical Reflection. [Anniversary ed.]. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9780230369436
23.
Dany, Charlotte. Janus-faced NGO Participation in Global Governance: Structural Constraints for NGO Influence. Global Governance. 2014;20(3):419-436.
24.
Koenig-Archibugi M. Introduction: Civil Society Influence on Global Policy. Global Policy. 2014;5(2):212-213. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12107
25.
Whall H, Pytlak A. The Role of Civil Society in the International Negotiations on the Arms Trade Treaty. Global Policy. 2014;5(4):453-468. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12173
26.
Jackson K. The Arms Trade Treaty: A historic and momentous failure. https://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/failure-arms-trade-treaty/
27.
Acheson, R. Starting Somewhere: The Arms Trade Treaty, Human Rights and Gender Based Violence. Human Rights Defender. 2013;22(2):17-19. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurighdef22&collection=journals&id=51
28.
Bolton M, Guerra H, Acheson R, Sprague O. The Road Forward for the Arms Trade Treaty: A Civil Society Practitioner Commentary. Global Policy. 2014;5(4):469-473. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12172
29.
Protecting Civilians and Humanitarian Action through the Arms Trade Treaty - International Committee of the Red Cross. Published online 2013. https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-4069.pdf
30.
Long, Graham. Justification and legitimacy in global civil society. Journal of Global Ethics. 2008;4(1):51-66. doi:10.1080/17449620701855361
31.
Dodworth K. NGO legitimation as practice: working state capital in Tanzania. Critical African Studies. 2014;6(1).
32.
Lang S. NGOs, Civil Society, and the Public Sphere. Cambridge University Press; 2014.
33.
Meyer JW. Globalization: Sources and effects on national states and societies. International Sociology. 2000;15(2):233-248.
34.
Anderson, Kenneth, Rieff D. ‘Global Civil Society’: A Sceptical View (Washington College of Law Research Paper No. 2008-69). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=899771
35.
Scholte, JA. Civil society and democratically accountable global governance. Government and Opposition. 2004;39(2):211-233.
36.
Slaughter S. The prospects of deliberative global governance in the G20: legitimacy, accountability, and public contestation. Review of International Studies. 2013;39(01):71-90. doi:10.1017/S0260210512000058
37.
The Peace Corps: An Indictment. http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1968/1/17/the-peace-corps-an-indictment-pwe/
38.
Plonski P. Peace Corps + BFA = Tremendous Success in Africa! | HuffPost. Published 2 Autumn 2013. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/patrick-plonski/peace-corps-books-for-africa_b_2687183.html
39.
Strauss RL. Think Again: The Peace Corps. https://foreignpolicy.com/2008/04/22/think-again-the-peace-corps/
40.
Jahnke M. Why I Joined The Peace Corps. Published 2AD. https://mondaybazaarblog.com/2016/06/02/why-i-joined-the-peace-corps/
41.
Calhoun C. Occupy Wall Street in perspective. The British Journal of Sociology. 2013;64(1):26-38. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12002
42.
Kaldor M, Selchow S. The ‘Bubbling Up’ of Subterranean Politics in Europe. Journal of Civil Society. 2013;9(1):78-99. doi:10.1080/17448689.2013.784501
43.
Della Porta, Donatella, Rucht, Dieter. Meeting Democracy: Power and Deliberation in Global Justice Movements. Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9781139609128
44.
Flesher Fominaya, Cristina, Cox, Laurence. Understanding European Movements: New Social Movements, Global Justice Struggles, Anti-Austerity Protest. Vol Routledge advances in sociology. Routledge; 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9780203083710
45.
Wood, Lesley J. Direct Action, Deliberation, and Diffusion: Collective Action after the WTO Protests in Seattle. Vol Cambridge studies in contentious politics. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
46.
Gerbaudo P. Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. Pluto; 2012. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UniLincoln&isbn=9781849648004
47.
Earl J. Protest Online: theorizing the consequences of online engagement. In: Bosi L, Giugni M, Uba K, eds. The Consequences of Social Movements. Cambridge University Press; 2016:363-400.
48.
Bennett WL, Segerberg A. The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15(5):739-768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
49.
Bennett, W. Lance. The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2012;644(1):20-39.
50.
Anduiza Perea, Eva, Jensen, Michael James, Jorba, Laia. Digital Media and Political Engagement Worldwide: A Comparative Study. Vol Communication, society and politics. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
51.
Jordan T, Taylor PA. The dot.communist manifesto. In: Hacktivism and Cyberwars: Rebels with a Cause?. Routledge; 2004:145-163.
52.
Gibson R, Cantijoch M. Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline? The Journal of Politics. 2013;75(3):701-716. doi:10.1017/S0022381613000431
53.
Härdig AC. Beyond the Arab revolts: conceptualizing civil society in the Middle East and North Africa. Democratization. 2015;22(6):1131-1153. doi:10.1080/13510347.2014.917626
54.
Plaetzer, Niklas. Civil society as domestication: Egyptian and Tunisian uprisings beyond liberal transitology. Journal of International Affairs. 2014;68(1):255-265.
55.
Juergensmeyer M. Commentary: Tahrir Square, the Death of Bin Laden, and the Revival of Civil Society. Journal of Civil Society. 2011;7(3):293-295. doi:10.1080/17448689.2011.605000
56.
Pierce, Anne. US ‘Partnership’ with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and its Effect on Civil Society and Human Rights. Society. 2014;51(1).
57.
Webb AK. The rise of the cosmopolitan traditionalists: From the Arab Spring to a global countermovement? International Political Science Review. 2015;36(4):425-440. doi:10.1177/0192512113516901
58.
Cuttitta P. Repoliticization Through Search and Rescue? Humanitarian NGOs and Migration Management in the Central Mediterranean. Geopolitics. 2018;23(3):632-660. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1344834
59.
Stierl M. A sea of struggle – activist border interventions in the Mediterranean Sea. Citizenship Studies. 2016;20(5):561-578. doi:10.1080/13621025.2016.1182683
